|
|
coastal dynamics, impact on the surrounding habitats, as well as an increase in human pressure on the marine environment (due to discharges, wastewater, etc.) [...]. Has the Commission verified the Spanish allegations? Has an environmental impact assessment been carried out before the project was authorized? Would the implementation of the 'Eastside ' project constitute a breach of EU law ? What remedial measures should the responsible competent authorities take?” The European Commission gives the green light The questions sent to the European Commissioner for the Environment , the Slovenian Janez Potocnik , did not receive a response until February 10, when the Spanish delegation in Brussels received the pertinent explanations from the Commission. From the European police station, a single response was used to answer the three questions posed by the Spanish Luis de Grandes. Potocnik explains that “the Commission already raised the issue of the 'Eastside' project with the UK authorities in 2011. An environmental impact assessment was carried out in accordance with Directive 2011/92/EU before granting the project the corresponding execution authorization.” The Commission was informed from London that the procedure provided for in Article 7 of the aforementioned Directive had not been launched since “the evaluation concluded that the project, as finally authorized, was not going to have a significant cross-border impact.” about the environment ".
The head of the Environment adds that " recently, the Commission has requested additional clarifications from the United Kingdom in relation to this project." Brussels has not yet received a response from London: “At this time, the Commission is awaiting the response from the Phone Number List United Kingdom.” The project has been progressing at a good pace since August The Government's complaint to the EU, and the subsequent written questions to the Commission, are Spain's response to the works that Gibraltar accelerated last August , when it used part of the concrete blocks thrown into the sea to create a breakwater. to protect the future 'Eastside' marina. In addition to the progress in the formation of the port, the Rock also 'sealed', with more artificial fills, the area in which luxury homes will be installed for tourists . Next to these blocks, large skyscrapers will be built to house important companies in the neighborhood. The entire complex, which will also include a hotel, a spring and a park, will be built at the foot of the rock and will extend towards the sea.
And he issued a warning to sailors: “Public powers have to be objective and be very careful when launching hypotheses . ” Following these words from the leader of the network, Cascos has decided to make a move and, as El Confidencial Digital has learned , he has already instructed his lawyer, Eduardo Estrada , to draft the complaint against the UDEF. It will be based on the damage caused to his privacy and image by the police accusation, and on Correa's assumption of the acronym PAC. Sources close to the former minister assure that the UDEF “knows that it has done wrong.” “I can't say anything else at the moment. Nothing less. But the UDEF knows that PAC is not Francisco Álvarez Cascos ,” these sources limit themselves to stating. No relationship since 1995 On Tuesday, when the Police report was known, the current president of Foro Asturias already proclaimed his innocence. He assured in a statement that the UDEF report that linked him to the Gürtel network was absolutely false, adding that he had not maintained “any type of relationship with Mr. Correa or his companies since 1995.” In that statement, Cascos already warned of his intention to defend himself against the accusations to the last consequences. The information from the UDEF, the statement said, “constitutes an attack on the dignity of any citizen in a system of constitutional guarantees that proclaims legal security and the protection of people as general principles .
|
|
發表於 13:13:04